While Adolf Hitler was democratically
elected in Germany, in Athens Le Corbusier led the IV “Congrès
International d'Architecture Moderne (CIAM)” embracing his ideas. They
both had a clear and very structured “vision” for a new engineered
society... and a better world, at least according to their perspective,
of course. It was 1933.
At a later stage Hitler created
concentration camps made of barracks far away from cities, for secluding
there non Aryan people, while Le Corbusier and his followers projected
and built concentration camps made of concrete, where stuffing and
isolating from the rest of the population the least fortunate
inhabitants of cities. There are huge differences between the two ill
minded “projects”, being the first brutal and the second more
sophisticated, but they were somehow united by the goal of keeping
“pariah” far away from “normal people’s” eyes: in the first case people
belonging to a different “race”, in the second people belonging to the
lowest social classes. They were all “removed” from cities' living cores.
Coherently,
the engineered and absolutistic vision of life (for a functionalist world) was taking
form. No matter how, but it was. And, even if at different levels, they
both were crimes against humanity.
Anyway, while the defeat of
Nazism stopped the atrocities of a sick ideology, Le Corbusier’s
followers kept on infesting the world with appalling buildings, sort of
open-air jails, where all that people not belonging to the fortunate
middle and upper classes were isolated. Corviale is one the most
infamous examples.
Why such an important prologue for a mediocre comedy like Scusate se esisto!?
Because in my opinion there is a thin line (a blood-red line, and not a
green line) that it is possible to draft between Benigni’s masterpiece La vita è bella [Life Is Beautiful]
and this film: they both make an attempt of dealing with irony with two
tragedies of the XX century. While Benigni magically manages to describe
with lightness the atrocities of a Nazi concentration camp, without
becoming banal or superficial and still condemning such a tragedy, in Scusate se esisto!
the levity of the description tends to become frivolous, trite,
inconsistent, cheap. Moreover, Riccardo Milani and Paola Cortellesi
(screenwriters of Scusate se esisto!)
with such a light comedy sneakily transmit an almost subliminal (but
dangerous) ungrounded (and immoral) message: the “Corviale monster” is a
place where – introducing some minor changes – it would be possible to
live. And be happy to live there!
The film ends saying “the thin
green line” project for transforming Corviale form hell into paradise
exists, it is real! Wow, so it was not just a silly comedy? There is a
real silly architect behind it as well! Anyway, in their film they forget
to explain how such an insane idea could take form. Just dealing with
practical matters: how could they force out part of its inhabitants,
kicking out people living there, for creating in it services? Moreover,
for a similar amount of money, why pegging away with the (impossible)
idea of rehabilitating a disgraceful edifice, that is falling apart and
where no free soul would ever decide to live in, instead of tearing it
down and replace it with decent and ecofriendly houses?
I better avoid further comments. I already dedicated too much time to Corviale.
For
the rest, the movie offers some hilarious moments. But watch out! They
might be there just for sweetening the bitter pill they want you to
swallow...
The comparison between on your article is useful to provoke a discussion around a very central topic. I watched "Scusate se esisto" and I really appreciated it, the way the author explaines great competence in this article. I have no competence on this subject but I think that we have so many "Corviale" in our countries and we should work to transform them the way the young architect has projected in the movie's plot. Besides that was not fictional!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment Fabrizio. True, sadly enough that movie was not just fictional. Anyway, could you please explain why you think poor people should live in buildings like Corviale (and Le Vele in Naples, the ZEN neighbourhood in Palermo, etc.)?
ReplyDeleteTalking about another movie, do you remember where was living one of the main characters of the French film “The Intouchables”?
I didn't mean that poor people should live there I meant that I would be happy if the Municipality in Rome would apply the project about Corviale in order to give peolple the chance to change their everyday life. In my opinion every building in the city should be inhabited by different classes of people (if the term class is still working) to improve relationships among citizens
ReplyDeleteIf with your family you had to choose between Corviale and La Garbatella, where would you live?
ReplyDelete